Is it better to approach conversations about God through a cosmological or ontological approach? Why?

Please submit a paper of 1500-2000 words in length that makes a convincing argument in responding to one of the questions below. The paper must have a thesis that offers analysis or critique over and above merely responding to the prompt. In responding to the prompt, you should draw on two different thinkers to make your point. Those thinkers can agree or disagree. You must use the text to support the claim you are making. It is not your job to summarize all of the text, you are only discussing those parts of the text that are relevant to the claim you are making. Of course, a good argument should be able to recognize and respond to a challenge or counter argument against it. A good argument deals in specifics. You should be referring to the text directly and in detail. This paper is not about all of humanity or anything that has happened since the beginning of time. It is strictly about making sense of ideas in the texts from our course. This is not a research paper. You can read secondary sources (things not by the authors we read but about them) to try to make sense of the material but you should not be drawing on them to make the claims of your paper. Really bad grammar and spelling errors can certainly ruin a good idea so you should be good about editing your paper and looking through it for such mistakes. The clarity of good grammar and spelling should not be confused for excessive sophistication and complicated style. The aim of this paper is to think through the text in a certain way and so the content of the ideas will, in this case, be more important than using fancy style or flowery language.