Neuroscience Question

DirectionsReview Drugs A, B, C, and D (PDF) (Links to an external site.). Look at the receptors each of the drugs bind to and note the actions they have at the various receptor sites. Based on their individual receptor binding profiles and the actions on those receptors, answer the following questions for each drug in a paper no longer than two double-spaced pages (not including the reference page). APA formatting is not required for this assignment. Include at least two evidence-based sources as references. Cite your references within your paper accordingly. Describe what therapeutic effect you would anticipate from the drug. What are three probable side effects you anticipate from the drug, based on the actions the drug has at the various receptor binding sites? What are at least two side effects you would not expect, based on the actions the drug has at the various receptor binding sites? Similarity ScoreAfter submitting your assignment, select Submission Details to view your similarity score. Your similarity score will appear as a percentage next to your submitted file. It may take up to 24 hours for your similarity score to appear. RubricShort Paper Rubric Short Paper Rubric CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration of Knowledge 10 to 8.0 ptsDemonstrates full understanding and application of course concepts integrated into own insights. Shows analysis and synthesis of ideas. 8 to 6.0 ptsDemonstrates that you understand and have applied course concepts for the most part. Shows some analysis and synthesis of ideas. 6 to 4.0 ptsDemonstrates that you understand and have applied course concepts to some extent. Some conclusions are not supported in the paper. 4 to 2.0 ptsDemonstrates that you only partially understand and have applied course concepts. Most conclusions are not supported in the paper. 2 to 0 ptsDoes not demonstrate that you fully understand and have applied course concepts. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic Focus 10 to 8.0 ptsThe paper is appropriately focused. A thesis statement provides direction. 8 to 6.0 ptsThe paper is mostly focused. A thesis statement provides some direction. 6 to 4.0 ptsThe topic is focused but lacks direction. 4 to 2.0 ptsThe topic is too broad or too narrow. 2 to 0 ptsThe topic is not clearly defined. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDepth of Discussion 10 to 8.0 ptsIncludes in-depth discussion and elaboration throughout the paper. 8 to 6.0 ptsIncludes in-depth discussion and elaboration in most of the paper. 6 to 4.0 ptsIncludes in-depth discussion and elaboration in some of the paper. 4 to 2.0 ptsOmits pertinent content or content runs on excessively. Quotations from others outweigh your own ideas excessively. 2 to 0 ptsOnly contains cursory discussion. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCohesiveness 10 to 8.0 ptsTies together information from all sources. Paper flows from one point to the next. Demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. 8 to 6.0 ptsFor the most part, ties together information. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. Demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material. 6 to 4.0 ptsSometimes ties together information. Paper mostly does not flow and much disjointedness is apparent. Demonstrates only some understanding of the relationship among material. 4 to 2.0 ptsRarely ties together information. Paper does not flow. Does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material. 2 to 0 ptsDoes not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be about disparate issues. Does not demonstrate understanding of relationship among material. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting, Composition, Grammar, Spelling, References, and APA Format 10 to 8.0 ptsExcellently written and composed. No errors in format, references, spelling, and grammar. 8 to 6.0 ptsWell written and composed. A few minor errors in format, references, spelling, and/or grammar. 6 to 4.0 ptsSomewhat well written and composed. Many minor errors in format, references, spelling, and/or grammar. 4 to 2.0 ptsPoorly written and composed. Major errors in format, references, spelling, and/or grammar, but still understandable. 2 to 0 ptsVery poorly written and composed. Major errors in format, references, spelling, and/or grammar make it difficult to understand. 10 pts

The post Neuroscience Question a .
.