Part 1: Using the following articles answer the following question (150 word min-Order now from essaywritingagents.com

Part 1: Using the following articles answer the following question (150 word min-Order now from essaywritingagents.com
Part 1: Using the following articles answer the following question (150 word minimum).Discuss why it is important to maintain professional boundaries when working within the field of psychology?Part 2: Using the following articles answer the following question (150 word minimum).What are some potential consequences if a professional has loose or poor professional boundaries? What are some factors that may make it difficult to maintain professional boundaries?Articles:“Boundary Issues” by Knapp, Gottlieb, & Handelsman, from Ethical Dilemmas inPsychotherapy: Positive Approaches to Decision Making (2015). DOI:10.1037/14670-007Decoding the Ethics Fisher, C. (2017). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. ISBN-13: 9781483369297 https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9781483369303/epub/OEBPS/s9781483399775.i1710.html#page_234“Can Boundary Crossings in Clinical Supervision Be Beneficial?” by Kozlowski, Pruitt, DeWalt, & Knox, from Counselling Psychology Quarterly (2014). DOI 10.1080/09515070.2013.870123Part 3:Read “Case 4: Research on Intimate Partner Violence and the Duty to Protect” located inAppendix A: Case Studies for Ethical Decision Making, in the textbook. Once you have readthe case study, complete the questions provided.Textbook: Fisher, C. (2017). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. ISBN-13: 9781483369297 https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9781483369303/epub/OEBPS/s9781483399775.i3583.html#page_647Directions: In a minimum of 60 words, for each question, thoroughly answer each of the questions below regarding Case 4: Research on Intimate Partner Violence and the Duty to Protect. Use one to two scholarly resources to support your answers. Use in-text citations, when appropriate, according to APA formatting.1.Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma?2.Who are the stakeholders and how will they be affected by how Dr. Yeung resolves this dilemma?3.Does this situation meet the standards set by the Tarasoff decision’s “duty to protect” statute (see Chapter 7)? How might whether or not Dr. Yeung’s state includes researchers under such a statute influence Dr. Yeung’s ethical decision making? How might the fact that Dr. Yeung is a research psychologist without training or licensure in clinical practice influence the ethical decision?4.In addressing this dilemma, should Dr. Yeung consider how her decision may affect the completion of her research (e.g., the confidentiality concerns of other participants)?5.How are APA Ethical Standards 2.01f, 3.04, 3.06, 4.01, 4.02, 4.05, and 8.01 relevant to this case? Which other standards might apply?6.What are Dr. Yeung’s ethical alternatives for resolving this dilemma? Which alternative best reflects the Ethics Code aspirational principles and enforceable standards, legal standards, and obligations to stakeholders? Can you identify the ethical theory (discussed in Chapter 3) guiding your decision?7.What steps should Dr. Yeung take to implement her decision and monitor its effect?References
Looking for a similar paper from proficient writers?
Place an order with us to get the best grades in your class!
Our papers are original
We will email you a copy together with the plagiarism report!